Legal Opinion

Burk v. Washington

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 12, 1998No. 89829PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

713 So.2d 988 (1998)

Hon. Warren BURK, Circuit Court Judge, etc., Petitioner,

v.

Shalonda WASHINGTON, Respondent.

No. 89829.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 12, 1998.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Anthony J. Hall and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, for Petitioner.

Blaise Trettis, Executive Assistant Public Defender, Viera, for Respondent.

ANSTEAD, Justice.

We have for review Washington v. Burk, 704 So.2d 540 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), based upon direct and express conflict with Drost v. Drost, 519 So.2d 698 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3),…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  5. Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CliftonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. Woods v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. Pezzo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  4. State v. J. M.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  5. State v. CliftonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API