Legal Opinion
Tucker v. R.M. Tours
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 21, 2009No. 49 EAP 2008PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice EAKIN.
After the trial court entered judgment in this case, appellants timely appealed to the Superior Court. The trial court ordered appellants to file a concise statement of matters complained of on appeal, pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b). 1 Appellants filed a timely Rule 1925(b) statement which was far from concise, being 16 pages long with 14 attached exhibits. The trial court found it “unworkable” and sua sponte ordered appellants to file an amended Rule 1925(b) statement. Appellants filed an amended statement, which reduced the original statement, but only by half, being…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Kanter v. EpsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. McBrideSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- In Re Milton Hershey SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Eichinger, J., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. VurimindiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- G&G Investors, LLC v. Phillips Simmons Real Estate Holdings, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Gibraltar Rock, Inc. v. New Hanover TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Edwards v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.