Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pennell

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Potter County

Decided January 29, 1991No. 92 of 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

LEETE, P.J.,

Before the court are omnibus pretrial motions by defendant. The motions include a writ of habeas corpus challenging the sufficiency of the evidence produced at the preliminary hearing as well as a motion to suppress a statement taken from defendant by the Pennsylvania State Police.

Defendant was charged with two counts of involuntary manslaughter, causing a catastrophe, risking a catastrophe, and reckless endangerment. These charges were originally filed before District Justice Katherine Garrote, who found that the Commonwealth had not established a prima facie case. Thereafter,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LobiondoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. HeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. People v. PeabodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Schultz v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Commonwealth v. YoungkinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API