State v. Silvers
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Chief Justice.
This case comes to the writer on reassignment. 2
Defendant was convicted of assault in the second degree. His motion for a new trial was denied, and he appeals to this court.
As we view the record, a careful examination of it requires a reversal because of the asking of prejudicial questions by the prosecution. Complainant had invited defendant to his house to confer about defendant’s conduct toward complainant’s wife. He admitted that during the course of this conference he used language toward defendant, calculated to provoke the breach of the peace which, he says,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. AnthonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Buel v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. LeinweberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. NorgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. CoursolleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- State v. WoffordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.