Legal Opinion

Dunne v. City of Fall River

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 31, 1952PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

In this action of contract the plaintiff seeks compensation for services in inducing industrial concerns to locate in the defendant city. The defendant answered, with a general denial, a claim of payment, and an assertion that any contract was one not to be performed within, one year which without a sufficient memorandum could not be enforced under the statute of frauds. The defendant declared in set-off for $12,500 paid to the plaintiff by the city for inducing one Crieger to locate in the city, which the plaintiff failed to accomplish, whereby the consideration has failed.

In the Superior…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Cook v. Farm Service Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Frederick v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Adalian Bros. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Carey v. FitzpatrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. SalemmeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  2. State Ex Rel. Employment Security Board v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  3. City of New Bedford v. Lloyd Investment Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. Meng v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  5. Selame Associates, Inc. v. Holiday Inns, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API