Legal Opinion

Ex parte Ditchburn

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1898PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Application for the disbarment of John Ditchburn, an attorney of this court.

1Per curiam

This proceeding was instituted by the state, upon the relation of the attorney-general, to disbar an attorney for unprofessional conduct. The information charges that in the year 1892 John Ditch-burn, a licensed attorney, was retained to prosecute an appeal from a judgment rendered in the Circuit Court for Multnomah County against one Moldenhauer, and, in perfecting the same, executed an under*539taking therefor to which he fraudulently subscribed the names of M. H. Duntley and Edward Karsten as sureties, and in like manner also signed their names to the affidavit thereon and, as a notary public,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bar Ass'n v. GreenhoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  2. Heintz v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. State ex. rel. Wolfe v. KirkeSupreme Court of Florida · 1868
  4. Sanborn v. KimballSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1875
  5. In re Disbarment of PhilbrookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wernimont v. State ex rel. Little Rock Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. State ex rel. Dill v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. In re Disbarment of MacySupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. In Re KingOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Wigton v. DonnellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API