Legal Opinion · Dissent
Univex International, Inc. v. Orix Credit Alliance, Inc.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 22, 1996No. 95SC284Published
1DissentJustice Kirshbaum
The majority concludes that the court of appeals properly determined that the statute of frauds applicable to credit agreements contained in section 38-10-124(2), 16A C.R.S. (1995 Supp.), bars the claims of plaintiffs-petitioners Univex International, Inc. and CPC, Inc., now known as Data Packaging Corporation (hereafter referred to collectively as “Univex”) against defendant-respondent Orix Credit Alliance, Inc. (Orix) for breach of contract and promissory estoppel arising out of an alleged oral agreement for the sale of certain equipment to Univex by Orix. The majority also determines that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Texaco, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellant v. William R. Ponsoldt, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Whitney Nat. Bank v. RockwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- FIRST NAT. BANK IN STAUNTON v. McBride Chevrolet, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Brown v. Founders Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Rural American Bank of Greenwald v. HerickhoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.