Legal Opinion

Landby v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoyne, J.

At the close of plaintiff’s case, and again at the close of the entire case, the court reserved decision on the motions of the respective defendants to dismiss the complaint. The jury having failed to reach an agreement, it is now incumbent upon the court to dispose of the motions. In making the present determination, it is not necessary to recite the evidence in detail. There is no dispute as to the facts surrounding the happening of the accident. Briefly, the decedent, an expert electrician, entered alone upon the private property of the defendant railroad company, when no one was nearby,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Steitz v. City of BeaconNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Murrain v. Wilson Line, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  3. Murrain v. Wilson Line, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. King v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gullian v. Austin R. Newcombe & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  3. Schuster v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API