Legal Opinion
King v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 23, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge A. Arkwright, J.
The codefendant city seeks to dismiss as legally insufficient against it a complaint wherein the following facts are alleged:
That for a period of time ‘ ‘ before, during and after the 8th day of February 1952,” the codefendant, a labor union, “ was conducting a strike ’ ’ against a certain insurance company; that in furtherance thereof such union maintained “ a picket line consisting of three members of the Union ” in front of a branch office of such insurance company of 1860 Flatbush Avenue, Brooklyn; that on February 8, 1952, “ wMle the plaintiff was peacefully walking along Flatbush…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bernardine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Steitz v. City of BeaconNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- McCrink v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Dunham v. Village of CanisteoNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Runkel v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Walters v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Drake v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1979
- Ast v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1984