Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 5, 1929No. 27,091PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
In this action to recover on an injunction bond, the defendant surety was denied a new trial and appeals.
July 18, 1923, plaintiff sold and agreed to convey , to Frank and Marie Tergeon, husband and wife, a residence property. The vendees defaulted and the contract was canceled by statutory notice April 14, 1924. April 25 plaintiff commenced in the municipal court of Minneapolis an action of unlawful detainer against the Tergeons to secure the restitution of the premises. May 2, 1924, Marie Tergeon, one of the vendees, sued plaintiff in the district court of Hennepin county for an injunction…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Methodist Churches of New York v. . BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Standard Salt & Cement Co. v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- City of Winona v. Minnesota Railway Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- Melady v. South St. Paul Live Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Tyler Min. Co. v. Last Chance Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carr v. Citizens Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Matesic v. MarasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929