Matesic v. Maras
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.
Appeal by defendant Maras from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. Plaintiff had a verdict against him for $6,968.33.. Jurisdiction was •not obtained over the other two defendants. The action Avas brought to recover $5,000 and interest thereon, the complaint charging defendants Avith conversion of the principal sum by the carrying out of a conspiracy to secure possession thereof by means of artifice, trick and device; certain details in regard thereto are later recited.
A demurrer was interposed on the ground that the complaint…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kefuss v. WhitleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Farley v. PeeblesNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Moore v. FrymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Delasca v. GrimesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Hamilton v. McIndooSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nathan v. St. Paul Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Allum v. Federal Cartridge Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Rockwell v. RockwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930