Legal Opinion

Matesic v. Maras

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 19, 1929No. 27,142PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Appeal by defendant Maras from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. Plaintiff had a verdict against him for $6,968.33.. Jurisdiction was •not obtained over the other two defendants. The action Avas brought to recover $5,000 and interest thereon, the complaint charging defendants Avith conversion of the principal sum by the carrying out of a conspiracy to secure possession thereof by means of artifice, trick and device; certain details in regard thereto are later recited.

A demurrer was interposed on the ground that the complaint…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kefuss v. WhitleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Farley v. PeeblesNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Moore v. FrymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  4. Delasca v. GrimesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Hamilton v. McIndooSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nathan v. St. Paul Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Allum v. Federal Cartridge Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Rockwell v. RockwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API