Legal Opinion

United States v. Bohol

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 26, 2009No. 08-10309Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

James H. Bohol appeals from the district court’s order finding probable cause to detain him pending a hearing regarding revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Bohol contends that the district court erred in determining that he is a flight risk. We conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Bohol had not met his burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he is not a flight risk. See United States v. Loya, 23 F.3d 1529, 1530 (9th Cir.1994).

Bohol’s contention that his detention…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Marlene Eberle, and Robert Kiser v. City of Anaheim Anaheim Police Department P. Shepard Hagenson MonsoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Steven Dale WinsorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Jesus LoyaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API