Legal Opinion

Ex parte Falls

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided May 24, 1918PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Petition by Harry C. Palls for writ of habeas corpus. Writ dismissed, on the ground that the petitioner was a person “serving with the armies of the United States in the field,” and was therefore “subject to military law,” and to trial by court-martial.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, District Judge.

Harry C. Palls, Ihe petitioner, a citizen of the United States, applied to the Bureau of the United States Army Transport Service, at its office in New York City, which is under the Quartermaster’s Department, for employment. Articles of agreement, providing for the service of the petitioner, were signed by him and Capt. J. J. Dawson, Q. M. U. S. R., who was acting for the United States. Petitioner was then assigned to duty as chief cook upon the ship U. S. A. C. T. Edward Uuckeuhach, which was lying at Bush Terminal, Brooklyn, and was engaged in transporting supplies…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MilliganSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. In Re GrimleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Kurtz v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Ex parte GerlachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917
  5. Runkle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1884

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Reid v. CovertSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Duncan v. KahanamokuSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. United States v. AliCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
  4. McCune v. KilpatrickDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1943
  5. Ex parte JochenDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1919

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API