Spinale v. Tenzer Greenblatt, LLP
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered April 15, 2002, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In determining the applicable statutory period, the reality and essence of a cause of action, rather than what its proponent has named it, governs (see Bunker v Bunker, 80 AD2d 817, 818 [1981], citing Brick v Cohn-Hall-Marx Co., 276 NY 259, 264 [1937]). Although plaintiffs pleaded causes of action nominally for restitution and unjust enrichment, those causes are based on the same allegations as their…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Bunker v. BunkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. Proskauer Rose LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Malmsteen v. BERDON, LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Shak v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016