Legal Opinion

Spinale v. Tenzer Greenblatt, LLP

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 21, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered April 15, 2002, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In determining the applicable statutory period, the reality and essence of a cause of action, rather than what its proponent has named it, governs (see Bunker v Bunker, 80 AD2d 817, 818 [1981], citing Brick v Cohn-Hall-Marx Co., 276 NY 259, 264 [1937]). Although plaintiffs pleaded causes of action nominally for restitution and unjust enrichment, those causes are based on the same allegations as their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Bunker v. BunkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Proskauer Rose LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Malmsteen v. BERDON, LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  3. Shak v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API