Thompson v. Ralston Purina Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
This lawsuit, K 83-544, arises from a black man’s discharge from employment and was brought by Plaintiff without the benefit of counsel. The Complaint accuses the Defendants, Union and Company, of conduct that appears consistent with “hybrid 301” (involving section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, and breach of the fair representation duty) and Title VII violations. The case is now before the Court on the Defendants’ Motions for Dismissal and Summary Judgment.
This lawsuit has a rather involved procedural history. There are essential…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- William Habib, Ruth Habib v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Walter MacOn v. Itt Continental Baking Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- West v. ConrailCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Edwards v. Whirlpool Corp., Aviation DepartmentDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
- Robert M. Ellenbogen v. Rider Maintenance Corp., New York City Taxi Drivers Union Local 3036, S.E.I.U., a.f.l.-c.i.o.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.