Frohlich v. Independent Glass Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Assumpsit by Simon Frohlich against the Independent Glass Company for breach of a contract of sale. There was judgment for plaintiff for less than the amount claimed, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, C. J.
Early in 1902 Edward Frohlich (plaintiff’s son), doing business as the Edward Frohlich Glass Company, and defendant entered into, a written contract whereby the latter agreed to sell, and the former to buy, upon 60 days’ credit, 15,000 boxes of glass at a stated price; the'same to be, delivered at the convenience of defendant during the following months of *280May and June. On the 21st of April, 1902, defendant wrote said Edward Frohlich Glass Company “that no specifications have been issued on account of your May and June contract, nor will they be until a full settlement of your unpaid account…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dingley v. OlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Wigent v. MarrsMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- F. W. Kavanaugh Manufacturing Co. v. RosenMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Griffin v. WattlesMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by4 opinions
- Coppola v. Marden, Orth & Hastings Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Frohlich v. Independent Glass Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Adams v. Edward M. Burke Homes, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Adams v. Edward M. Burke Homes, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968