Legal Opinion

Frohlich v. Independent Glass Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1912No. Docket No. 104PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne; Rohnert, J. Assumpsit by Simon Frohlich against the Independent Glass Company for breach of contract. After plaintiff’s decease, Edward Frohlich and Hannah Frohlich, his executors, were substituted as plaintiffs. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant for damages arising out of the failure of defendant to fill an order for glass according to contract. Upon a former trial, plaintiff recovered a sum less than he demanded. The judgment was reversed by this court. Frohlich v. Glass Co,, *429144 Mich. 278 (107 N. W. 889). Simon Frohlich, the original plaintiff, died, and the suit was revived in the name of his executors. Upon the last trial, the record of which is now before us for review, plaintiffs recovered a much larger verdict and judgment, and defendant alleges errors. The opinion of this court upon the former…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frohlich v. Independent Glass Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Seward v. Pennsylvania Salt Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API