Legal Opinion

La Patti Corp. v. Pacific Nat. Fire Ins.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided January 30, 1947No. 5030Published

1Opinion of the Court

HULEN, District Judge.

We are now presented with defendant’s motion to “quash the return on the writ of summons” issued by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. The case is here on removal from the State court. The record contains facts bearing upon the issue presented that are not in dispute.

Plaintiff, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Tennessee, is not licensed to do business in Missouri. Defendant, organized under the laws of California, is licensed to do business in Missouri as a foreign insurance corporation. It has complied with Section 6005, R.S.Mo. 1939,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Douglass v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Crabtree v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. Horton v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. State Ex Rel. American Central Life Insurance v. LandwehrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  5. State Ex Rel. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API