Sims v. Georgia Power Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
1. (a) The trial judge failed to specify the grounds of the second motion for a new trial as amended on which he .based his grant of the motion. Prior to 1959, this court held that there was no provision of law under which the trial judge could be compelled to so specify. Bass v. Pharr, 98 Ga. App. 125 (105 SE2d 286). Code § 6-1608 was amended by Ga. L. 1959, pp. 353, 354, so as to require, in part, that . . the trial judge shall state in all cases the ground or grounds upon which said new trial is granted.” Reference to the caption and the first provision of this section…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Stamey v. Rutherfordton Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Georgia Power Company v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Georgia Power Company v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Simpson v. BrandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Highway Department v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969