State v. Tucker
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
The appellee was charged with first degree murder. Following an in-chambers hearing, the court granted appellee’s motion to suppress certain evidence seized pursuant to a warrantless search of an apartment he shared with the victim of the alleged murder. Hence, the state brings this interlocutory appeal. Ark. Rules of Crim. Pro., Rule 36.10. The sole issue presented is whether the appellee had abandoned the premises. The state argues that appellee’s Fourth Amendment rights were not violated by the warrantless search inasmuch as the appellee had effectively abandoned the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. James Andrew Colbert and Michael Beryl ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Gary Lavaughn WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Morton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- State v. OsbornSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Lupro v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Rockett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Kirk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.