Legal Opinion

State v. Gray

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 30, 1997No. CR 97-460PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W.H. “Dub” Arnold, Chief Justice.

The State brings this interlocutory appeal under Ark. R. App. P. — Crim. 3(c), asserting the grounds that the trial court (1) improperly suppressed a one-pound bag of marijuana allegedly abandoned by appellee Mike Gray; and (2) erroneously concluded that appellee had standing to challenge the validity of a search warrant to search another person’s residence. The Attorney General maintains, as it is required to do under Rule 3(c), that the correct and uniform administration of justice requires our review of the trial court’s suppression order. Because we…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. State v. TownsendSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. State v. HartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. McCormackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. State v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. State v. DawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. State v. HowardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API