O'Banion v. O'Banion
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This divorce action was commenced in Washoe County by the wife. Within the time limited for answering, the husband, a resident of Lyon County, simultaneously filed a demand to change venue to the county of his residence and a motion *89therefor. His motion was denied and he has appealed to this court for relief.
The filing of a demand to change venue is a precondition to one’s right to have venue changed. Elam v. Griffin, 19 Nev. 442 (1887); Connolly v. Salsberry, 43 Nev. 182, 183 P. 391 (1919); Nevada Transit Co. v. Harris Bros., 80 Nev. 465, 396 P.2d 133 (1964); Byers v. Graton, 82 Nev.…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Elam v. GriffinNevada Supreme Court · 1887
- Connolly v. SalsberryNevada Supreme Court · 1919
- Nevada Transit Co. v. Harris Brothers Lumber Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1964
- Byers v. GratonNevada Supreme Court · 1966
4Cited by1 opinion
- Hood v. KirbyNevada Supreme Court · 1983