Legal Opinion · Dissent

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 26, 1989No. 88-1308Published

1DissentEasterbrook, Circuit Judge

Whether employers should restrain adults from engaging in acts hazardous to their children is an ethical, medical, economic, and political problem of great complexity. But this is a statutory case, and we must implement the law rather than give our own answer. Johnson’s policy is sex discrimination, forbidden unless sex is a “bona fide occupational qualification”— which it is not.

I

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbids employers “to discriminate against any individual ... because of such individual’s ... sex”, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(l), unless sex is a “bona fide occupational…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API