Legal Opinion
Scott Isert and Tammy Isert v. Ford Motor Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 25, 2006No. 04-5798PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
A few days before the deadline for filing a notice of appeal in this case, Scott and Tammy Isert, through their attorney, filed a motion in the district court asking for an extension of time in which “to file any Notice of Appeal.” JA 407. The court denied the motion, and the Iserts do not challenge that ruling. What they do contend is that their motion for an extension of time contained sufficient information to satisfy the requirements for a notice of appeal under Rule 3(c) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Because the motion failed to designate the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Smith v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Becker v. MontgomerySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Geraldine Burley v. Jeffery GagackiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Thomas Kohlbeck v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Bailey v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Keith Clark v. Larry CartledgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Theodore Jackson v. Brigham SloanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.