Legal Opinion

Piccione v. Arp

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 16, 2017No. S17A0782PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINES, Chief Justice.

Gregory and Adam Piccione (“the Picciones”), grandchildren of testator Virginia Arp (“Virginia”) and children of Donna Piccione (“Donna”), appeal from the superior court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment in this action against their three uncles, Sam and Dwayne Arp, individually and in their capacities as executors of Virginia’s estate, and David Arp. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Virginia executed a will in 2002. It provides for her burial and the payment of her debts, and the sole paragraph that sets forth the disposition of her property states in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hood v. ToddSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  2. Snellings v. DownerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. Sanders v. First Nat. Bank of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. MacGregor v. RouxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Rotmanskey v. HeissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carol Ramona Buchanan v. Samille B. HannonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023
  2. PICCIONE v. ARP, Exr.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API