Legal Opinion

Rotmanskey v. Heiss

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 4, 1898PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a pro forma decree of the Circuit Court of Baltimore City granting the relief asked for in a bill for the specific performance of a contract to buy land.

1Opinion of the CourtBryan, J.

In eighteen hundred and eighty-seven John M. Heiss, now deceased, executed a deed to his three children, John, Louisa and William, which conveyed to them four leasehold lots of ground in the city of Baltimore. The conveyance was made upon the following trust: “To have and to hold the said four described parcels of ground and premises, with the rights and appurtenances aforesaid, unto the said John C. C. Heiss, Louisa H. Heiss and William S. Heiss in trust, that the said John M. Heiss may be allowed to collect and receive the rents, income and profits issuing and payable out of said property,…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Patchell v. GroomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  2. Lycett v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  3. MacGregor v. RouxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  4. Shoch's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Ballenger v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API