Legal Opinion
Glaser v. Medford-Marlboro Knit Gaiter Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 1, 1944No. 3445PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurque, J.
The only issue argued is the construction of clause (c) in the agreement.
In addition to what appears in the Court’s findings, we might add for further assistance in the discussion of the issue, the following portions of the agreement in question.
“Agreement made this 25th day of June, 1940, between the Medford-Marlboro Knit Gaiter Co., a corporation organized under the laws of New Hampshire, with its usual place of business in Marlboro, New Hampshire, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Company’, Arthur Quint, of Keene, New Hampshire, also doing business as Essex Yarn Co., in Marlboro, New…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Curry v. . FowlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Estabrook v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Ross v. BurrageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stone and Michaud Ins., Inc. v. Bank Five for Sav.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1992
- Mooney v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1972
- Lapierre v. CabralSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Higgins v. HigginsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- McKenna v. American Institute, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.