Legal Opinion
Daizi v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 13, 1983No. 82-776PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WALDEN, Judge.
In a petition for habeas corpus the petitioner contends the Parole and Probation Commission (Commission) erred in assigning his presumptive parole release date (PPRD).
Pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040(c) (1982) we have elected to treat the petition for habeas corpus as a petition for writ of mandamus. See Moore v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 289 So.2d 719 (Fla.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 935, 94 S.Ct. 2649, 41 L.Ed.2d 239 (1974); Harrisson v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 428 So.2d 388 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Pannier v. Wainwright, 423 So.2d 533…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moore v. Florida Parole and Probation CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Pannier v. WainwrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Hardy v. GreadingtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Sala v. FLA. PAROLE & PROBATION COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Daizi v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Huffman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988