Legal Opinion

Huffman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 24, 1988No. 88-336Published

1Per curiam

David Huffman appeals from the denial of his petition for writ of mandamus. We affirm.

The petition, which named the State of Florida and the local state attorney as respondents, alleged no ministerial function that respondents have refused to perform. State ex rel. Buckwalter v. City of Lakeland, 112 Fla. 200, 150 So. 508 (1933). Instead, the record reveals that Huffman’s petition actually was an attempt to vacate his 1972 conviction and life sentence for rape. This is not a proper use of the writ of mandamus.

This misnomer alone might not justify denial of Huffman’s petition. The courts do…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Buckwalter v. City of LakelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. State v. BroomDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Daizi v. Florida Parole & Probation CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API