Stiner & Son v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7509 (T. D. 33959), G. A. 7510 (T. D. 33960).
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge
This case again brings before the court for construction paragraphs 349 and 350 of the tariff act of 1909. The two paragraphs read as follows:
349. Laces, lace window curtains, and all other lace articles; handkerchiefs, napkins, wearing apparel, and all other articles made wholly or in part of lace or laces, or in imitation of lace; nets, nettings, veils, veilings, neck rufflings, ruchings, tuckings, flutings, quillings, embroideries, trimmings, braids, feather stitch braids, edgings, inserting^, Bouncings, galloons, gorings, bands, bandings, belts, beltings, bindings, cords, ornaments,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Junge v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Salomon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. McBratneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
- Stein & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bush & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- Lussky, White & Coolidge, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- United States v. Max Littwitz, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931