Legal Opinion
Izett v. Crown Asset Management, LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 1, 2019No. 3:18-cv-05224Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DAVID ALLAN IZETT, Case No. 18-cv-05224-EMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 9 v. MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 10 CROWN ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC; REBEKAH MOORE A/K/A REBEKAH Docket No. 44 11 DENYS TONER; THE RESOLUTION LAW GROUP, APC; PERSOLVE, LLC; 12 and LUIS DUENAS, 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff David Allan Izett (“Plaintiff”) filed suit against Defendants Crown Asset 16 Management (“Crown”); Rebekah Moore; the Resolution Group, APC; Persolve, LLC; and Luis 17 Duenas (collectively “Defendants”). Docket No. 31.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.