Snyder v. San Francisco Feed & Grain
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy
Rita Mae Snyder appeals the judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court finding that her evidence did not establish a compensable industrial accident. San Francisco cross-appeals on the issue of the propriety of certain hypothetical questions. We reverse.
The issues before the Court are:
1. Was there substantial credible evidence to support the Workers’ Compensation Court’s judgment that Snyder did not suffer a compensable industrial accident?(a) Does a stress related injury require a “psychological reconstruction?”(b) Does a compensable injury require a showing of physical impact?(c) Does a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Graham v. RolandsonMontana Supreme Court · 1967
- Erhart v. Great Western Sugar CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1976
- Hert v. JJ Newberry Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
- Jones v. St. Regis Paper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
- Hoehne v. Granite Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Eastman v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
- McIntyre v. Glen Lake Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1991
- O'BRIEN v. Central FeedsMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- McClanahan v. Raley's, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2001
- White v. Ford, Bacon & Davis Texas, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.