Legal Opinion

Snyder v. San Francisco Feed & Grain

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1987No. 87-263PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

Rita Mae Snyder appeals the judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court finding that her evidence did not establish a compensable industrial accident. San Francisco cross-appeals on the issue of the propriety of certain hypothetical questions. We reverse.

The issues before the Court are:

1. Was there substantial credible evidence to support the Workers’ Compensation Court’s judgment that Snyder did not suffer a compensable industrial accident?(a) Does a stress related injury require a “psychological reconstruction?”(b) Does a compensable injury require a showing of physical impact?(c) Does a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Graham v. RolandsonMontana Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Erhart v. Great Western Sugar CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Hert v. JJ Newberry Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Jones v. St. Regis Paper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Hoehne v. Granite Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Eastman v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. McIntyre v. Glen Lake Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. O'BRIEN v. Central FeedsMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. McClanahan v. Raley's, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2001
  5. White v. Ford, Bacon & Davis Texas, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API