Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Morton v. Back

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1904No. 13,605PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Original application for a writ of mandamus to compel the city council of Omaha to meet as a board of equalization.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, C. J.

This action is begun in this court in the exercise of its original jurisdiction. The relators pray for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the respondents, the city council of Omaha, acting as a board of equalization, to reassemble and hear their complaint relative to the alleged low assessment of certain railroad properties situated within the corporate limits, and to equalize the assessment of such properties by raising the assessed value thereof to conform to the standard of value pertaining to all other property assessed for municipal purposes. The substance of the complaint is that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Columbus Southern Railway Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Ames v. People ex rel. TempleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  3. State ex rel. Bee Building Co. v. SavageNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  4. State ex rel. Breckenridge v. FlemingNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. State ex rel. Milwaukee Street Railway Co. v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Gamboni v. County of OtoeNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Grainger Brothers Co. v. County Bd. of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Ewert v. TaylorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Le Dioyt v. County of KeithNebraska Supreme Court · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API