McCabe v. Ernst & Young, LLP
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Chief Judge.
The principal issue in this securities fraud action against auditors Ernst & Young, LLP is whether plaintiffs presented sufficient evidence of loss causation to survive a summary judgment motion. We will affirm the grant of summary judgment.
I
A
Plaintiffs Daniel McCabe, Russell McCabe, and David Motovidlak (“the ATS Plaintiffs”) had been shareholders and officers of Applied Tactical Systems, Inc., a closely-held supply chain management company that was acquired by Vertex Interactive, Inc., a publicly-traded ¡supply chain management company. The Merger…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by150 opinions
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Lormand v. US Unwired, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Dorothy Daniels v. Philadelphia School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Pichler v. UNITECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Vichi v. Koninklijke Philips ElectronicsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.