Legal Opinion

Oelbermann v. Merritt

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 21, 1887PublishedCited by 20 opinions

This was an action against the collector of the port of New York, to recover back duties alleged to have been illegally exacted. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff sued out this writ of error. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatchford

This is an action at law brought in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York by the members of the copartnership firm of E. Oelbermann & Co., against the. collector of the port of New York, in November, 1880, to recover the sum of $1925.20, with interest, as an alleged excess of duties exacted by the collector on an importation of 31 cases of silk and cotton velvets into the port of New York from Germany, via Botterdam, in June, 1879.

There were two invoices covered by one entry. One of the invoices was for 10 cases and the other for 24 cases. The collector…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hilton v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Greely's Administrator v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  3. Greely v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  4. Canal Bank v. Mayor of AlbanyNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  5. Marquette v. Probate Judge for Houghton CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Auffmordt v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Muser v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Stein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  4. The George W. RobyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  5. Wolff v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API