Legal Opinion

North Carolina Board of Pharmacy v. Rules Review Commission

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 2005No. COA04-929Published

1Opinion of the Court

620 S.E.2d 893 (2005)

NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF PHARMACY, Plaintiff,

v.

The RULES REVIEW COMMISSION, et al., Defendant.

No. COA04-929.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

November 1, 2005.

Bailey & Dixon, L.L.P., by Carson Carmichael, III, M. Denise Stanford, and Warren T. Savage, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.

McMillan, Smith & Plyler, by William W. Plyler and Stephen T. Smith, Raleigh, for defendant-appellee.

Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Solicitor General Christopher G. Browning, Jr., and Special Deputy Attorney General Gary R. Govert, for defendant-intervenor-appellee.

Kennedy Covington Lobdell…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources v. CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Amos v. Oakdale Knitting Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Brown v. FloweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Anderson v. AssimosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Frye Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API