Legal Opinion · Dissent

William J. Johnston v. Spacefone Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 22, 1983No. 82-8143Published

1DissentRoney, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. Since the employer never produced goods for commerce, Johnston could not have been engaged in such production. This case is unlike those relied upon by the Court which hold that where the employer is engaged in the production of goods for commerce, the support personnel, so to speak, are engaged in that effort, even if they are engaged in research and development, maintenance, or office and administrative work. E.g., Borden v. Borella, 325 U.S. 679, 65 S.Ct. 1223, 89 L.Ed. 1865 (1945); Tormey v. Kiekhaefer Corp., 76 F.Supp. 557 (E.D.Wis.1948). In those cases the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Lublin, McGaughy & AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Borden Co. v. BorellaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Raul C. Montalvo v. Tower Life Building and Tower Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. Tormey v. Kiekhaefer Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API