Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Humphreys

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1992No. 91-1447PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In In re Petition of Brown (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 222, 551 N.E.2d 954, and Manning v. Alexander (1990), 50 Ohio St.3d 127, 553 N.E.2d 264, we held that appeal, not habeas corpus, was the proper remedy to claim ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. In State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204, we held at paragraph two of the syllabus:

“Claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel may be raised in an application for reconsideration in the court of appeals or in a direct appeal to the Supreme Court pursuant to Section 2(B)(2)(a)(iii), Article IV of the Ohio…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MurnahanOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In re Brown for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad ProsequendumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Manning v. AlexanderOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Handcock v. Shoop (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Smith v. MitchellOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Washington v. EppingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Smith v. MitchellOhio Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API