Manning v. Alexander
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed based on our decision in In re Petition of Brown (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 222, 551 N.E. 2d 954, in which we held that appeal to this court pursuant to Section 2(B)(2)(a)(iii) of Article IV of the Ohio Constitution is
an adequate remedy at law to pursue a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel and that such actions may not be maintained in habeas corpus.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re Brown for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad ProsequendumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. MurnahanOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Paul R. Manning v. George AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Fernando Lopez v. Julius Wilson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Frederick White v. James Schotten, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Fernando Lopez v. Julius Wilson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.