State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Penrow
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
1. As was held on the first appearance of this case, the reservation of rights agreement which State Farm took from its insured Penrow avoided an estoppel against it based on the mere fact that it conducted a defense of the tort suit. Id., p. 821.
2. This does not, however, decide the question of waiver or estoppel to urge a policy forfeiture based on dealings between Wright and the company, which exact question required reversal of the summary judgment on the first appearance of this case. Wright’s counsel deposed then and testifies now that he would never have agreed to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Morgan v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Continental Insurance v. WeekesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Lee v. WarrenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
3Cited by8 opinions
- Capital City Developers, LLC v. Bank of North GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Smithloff v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Allstate Insurance v. SappCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AinsworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Peter E. Blum & Co. v. First Bank Building Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.