Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Maddox

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 9, 1961No. 21218PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moble?/Justice.

The controlling question in this case is whether or not the petition sets forth a cause of action for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of land.

Code § 37-801 states: “Specific performance of a contract (if within the power of the party) will be decreed generally whenever the damages recoverable by law would not be an adequate compensation for the nonperformance.” (Italics ours.)

“Equity will not decree specific performance of a wholly impossible act, for the reason that it will not decree a useless thing.” Whiteway Neon-Ad v. Maddox, 211 Ga. 27, 33 (83 S. E. 2d…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Willis v. HarrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Kimbrough v. KimbroughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  3. Stanley v. StembridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Lynch v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  5. Roberts v. BurnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Omni International, Ltd. v. Mimi's of Atlanta, Inc. (In Re Mimi's of Atlanta, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1980
  2. Adler's Package Shop, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Turnipseed v. JajeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  4. Jolles v. Holiday Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  5. Koets, Inc. v. BenvenisteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API