Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Engenious Designs LLC

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 22, 2021No. 2:21-cv-02364Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS WILLIAM G. GARDNER, III, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 2:21-cv-02364-HLT-ADM ENGENIOUS DESIGNS LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This is a patent case. Plaintiffs claim they own or license a patent that Defendant either directly or indirectly infringes. Defendant moves to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) and argues that the complaint fails to state a plausible claim for relief. Doc. 6. Because Plaintiffs fail to allege a plausible infringement claim, the Court grants Defendant’s motion and dismisses the complaint without…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Nalco Company v. Chem-Mod, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  4. Disc Disease Solutions Inc. v. Vgh Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  5. Bot M8 LLC v. Sony Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API