Legal Opinion

Planalto v. Ohio Casualty Insurance

District Court, D. Maine

Decided February 26, 2009No. Civil No. 07-142-P-HPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE/MOTION TO COMPEL

JOHN H. RICH III, United States Magistrate Judge.

In accordance with the terms of my Report of Hearing and Order re: Discovery Dispute dated January 11, 2009 (Docket No. 95), the parties have submitted timely supplemental briefs concerning, inter alia, whether about 1,000 pages of documents, withheld by the plaintiff, Planalto, from the file of the law firm Thompson & Bowie pertaining to its defense of Avian Farms in the case underlying this reach-and-apply action, are protected by the work product doctrine. Those briefs address whether…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Coal Companies v. Powell Construction Company and Interstate Equipment Corporation and Bethlehem Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. Paradigm Insurance v. Langerman Law Offices, P.A.Arizona Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. Sealed Air Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McCarthy v. Slade Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API