Legal Opinion

Town of Nottingham v. Bonser

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 9, 1988No. 86-005; No. 86-255PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.

The Superior Court (Nadeau, J.) ordered the defendants to reimburse the plaintiff for attorney’s fees incurred in seeking to enforce an order enjoining zoning violations and, in a separate proceeding, held the defendants in civil contempt for violating the original injunction. The defendants have appealed in each instance, although the corporate defendant has defaulted in the appeal from the fee award. We affirm each order.

More than seven years have passed since the events first giving rise to this litigation, which has required frequent and protracted appearances before the superior court,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Daboul v. Town of HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. Keenan v. FearonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Terren v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  2. Woodstock Soapstone Co. v. CarletonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  3. In re GoldmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  4. Daigle v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  5. Knox Leasing v. TurnerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API