Legal Opinion

Confederate Motors, Inc. v. Terny

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 19, 2012No. Civil Action No. 11-10213-JGDPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S RULE 57 MOTION SEEKING SPEEDY DECLARATION OVER ADVANCEMENT OF FEES

DEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the court on Defendant’s “Rule 57 Motion Seeking Speedy Declaration Over Advancement of Fees.” (Docket No. 122). By his motion, Francois-Xavier Terny (“Terny”) seeks a declaration, under Count VI of his Amended Counterclaim “that he is immediately entitled to advancement from Confederate of his costs and fees paid to date in litigating this action, and that any such amounts that are incurred going-forward will similarly be due and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Homestore, Inc. v. TafeenSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  2. Kaung v. Cole National Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  3. Westar Energy, Inc. v. LakeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  4. Fasciana v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
  5. Advanced Mining Systems, Inc. v. FrickeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API