Legal Opinion

Hamel v. Hamel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 6, 1937No. 25612Published

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

It is sought to reverse the action of the trial court in granting a new trial. The parties appear here as they appeared below, and will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant.

Plaintiff sued to recover the sum of $15,-000, the alleged value of certain corporate stock which it is alleged the defendant agreed to deliver under the terms of a written contract. It was alleged that this contract provided that in consideration of plaintiff’s doing and performing certain acts and things as provided by the contract, the defendant, as owner of the stock in question, would, after he received $25,000…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. James v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Kkk Medicine Co. v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Gibson v. Van LeuvenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API