Legal Opinion

Wreyford v. Arnold

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 11, 1970No. 448PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OMAN, Judge.

This cause arises out of a collision of motor boats being operated for pleasure on Navajo Lake or Reservoir on July 3, 1967.

Although plaintiff and plaintiff in intervention rely upon two points for reversal, both points relate to the single question of whether Navajo Lake is part of the navigable waters of the United States. We hold it is, and that the trial court erred in finding and concluding otherwise. Thus, we decide only the first point, and briefly consider the question of damages, since the case must be remanded to the trial court for the purpose of awarding damages…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. The MontelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hitchings v. Del Rio Woods Recreation & Park DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Wreyford v. ArnoldNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API