Legal Opinion

Messer-Johnson Realty Co. v. Newman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1923No. 6 Div. 976PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

On account of the adverse ruling of the trial court in sustaining demurrers to counts A and B, plaintiff in this action took a nonsuit, with bill of exceptions, and appeals.

The sufficiency of these counts is the only matter here presented for consideration. The allegations therein contained are consistent with the theory that plaintiff as a real estate agency was engaged by one -Hasty, the owner of certain real estate in the city of Birmingham, to sell said property and be compensated by way of a commission out of the purchase money; that the defendant as a prospective purchaser agreed to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Livermore v. CraneWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Morgan v. Whatley & WhatleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Atkinson v. . PackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. Eells Bros. v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. McKnight v. McGuireAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hatten R. Co. v. Baylies Et Ux.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Tanner Associates, Inc. v. CiraldoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Giovannoni v. Waple & James, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  4. Brockway-Mecklenburg Co. v. HildermanMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Turnure v. PossCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API