Legal Opinion

L.G.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 11, 1986No. 85-291PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Finding no error in the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss the amended petition, we affirm the adjudication of delinquency. The amended petition was filed after the expiration of the forty-five day filing period and merely substituted the correct name of the victim of the alleged offenses; it did not substantially alter the initial petition. Because the initial petition adequately informed defendant of the charges, we hold that the timely filing of the initial petition tolled the statutory filing period. State v. D.I., 474 So.2d 408 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); see Rubin v. State,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rubin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. State v. GarofaloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. J.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. State v. In the Interest of D.I.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. M.F. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. State v. T.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Interest of B.T. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. M.F. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. BT v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API