Legal Opinion

M.F. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 12, 1990No. 89-2561PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent, M.F., appeals an adjudication of delinquency. We affirm.

The respondent contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the amended petition for delinquency where the amended petition actually alleged an entirely new charge and where the state orally amended the petition sixty-nine days after he was taken into custody in violation of section 39.05(6), Florida Statutes (1989).1 We disagree. This case is controlled by Rule 8.110(c), Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure (1989), which provides:

At any time prior to the adjudicatory hearing an amended petition may…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Interest of EmDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. L.G.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. M.F. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Interest of B.T. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. BT v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. MF v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API